This Location Watch was prepared with valuable contributions from Temo Magradze, Founding Partner of Evolvexe BPO, as well as Davit Tavlalashvili, Head of the Investment Department, and Ketevan Kanashvili, Senior Investment Relations Manager at Enterprise Georgia. It also draws on research and insights from Ryan Strategic Advisory, specifically the report “2025 CX Technology and Global Services Survey”. Their perspectives on the evolution of Georgia’s outsourcing industry are especially insightful in highlighting why the country is gaining attention from UK, EU and North American companies as a nearshore and offshore delivery hub.

Georgia is rapidly gaining recognition as a promising BPO destination, thanks to its modern infrastructure, strategic government support, and a clear ambition to grow within the global outsourcing ecosystem. The recent BPO Leaders Summit 2025 in Tbilisi, hosted by Enterprise Georgia and Ryan Strategic Advisory, brought together industry experts, investors and government officials who confirmed the country’s strong potential.

1. Outsourcing Popularity & Market Positioning

As Temo Magradze emphasises, Georgia’s outsourcing industry has grown significantly in recent years. Its appeal lies in affordability, a highly skilled workforce, and a government eager to attract investment. Positioned at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, Georgia combines geographic advantage with a dynamic, pro-business climate, making it an increasingly popular hub for European operations.

According to the Ryan Strategic Advisory – 2025 CX Technology and Global Services Survey (see screenshot), Georgia scores 2.8, placing it slightly below mid-tier in offshore favorability. Yet, several countries ranked lower continue to be regarded as more mature outsourcing destinations due to their established ecosystems and long-standing track records:

• Turkey (2.6) – Longstanding BPO hub with strong multilingual capabilities, particularly in European market support.
• Colombia (2.7) – A leading nearshore delivery market for North America, well known for Spanish-English bilingual services.
• Nigeria (2.7) – Growing rapidly in scale with an established IT-enabled services sector and a deep labor pool.
• Slovenia (2.7) and Bulgaria (2.7) – Both EU member states with recognized nearshore outsourcing reputations, especially in IT, finance, and multilingual service delivery.

Although these markets rank lower than Georgia in the 2025 survey, they are considered more mature thanks to their larger delivery ecosystems, deeper outsourcing experience, and stronger global visibility. The fact that Georgia now scores ahead of such established players underlines its growing credibility and demonstrates how it is winning favorable attention against locations traditionally chosen for offshore and nearshore outsourcing.

2. Cost Competitiveness & Commercial Advantage

Labour and operational costs in Georgia are 40–50% lower than in established Central and Eastern European hubs such as Poland. Average salaries for customer service roles remain in the £456–£608 range, while programmers earn around £1,140 monthly.

One of Georgia’s strongest incentives is its International Company Status, which grants significant tax advantages, including reduced corporate tax rates. Coupled with government-backed grants and subsidies, this positions Georgia as one of the most cost-efficient outsourcing environments in the region.

3. Workforce, Language Skills & Talent Pool

Georgia boasts a multilingual workforce fluent in English, German, Russian and other European languages. Deloitte research estimates over 500,000 multilingual professionals across major cities. The most common roles include customer support, IT helpdesks, finance and accounting, and software development.

Universities and vocational institutes actively integrate English and technical training. Georgia’s education system, including institutions such as Kutaisi International University (developed with Germany’s Technical University of Munich), is producing a steady pipeline of outsourcing-ready professionals, many of whom are multilingual and STEM-focused.

4. Time Zone, Accessibility & Nearshoring Appeal

Situated in the UTC+4 time zone, Georgia overlaps conveniently with European working hours, while also complementing North American operations by enabling round-the-clock coverage.

Infrastructure for travel and remote collaboration is strong: Tbilisi, Kutaisi and Batumi airports all provide direct flights to key European hubs. This accessibility allows easy site visits and integration with international teams.

5. Infrastructure & BPO Ecosystem

Georgia has invested heavily in digital infrastructure, with 97% broadband coverage and widespread 4G/5G access. Tbilisi remains the primary outsourcing hub, but as Temo highlighted to me, there is rapid growth of secondary cities. For example, Evolvexe recently launched a major tech support project with ASUS from Kutaisi, servicing Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Batumi is also attracting investment and fast becoming a secondary BPO location.

6. Government Support & Incentives

The government, through Enterprise Georgia, plays a pivotal role in supporting BPO expansion. Simplified business registration (often completed in a single day), tax incentives, and subsidies for training make it easier for foreign companies to establish operations. While GITA focuses on supporting IT infrastructure and the ICT Association concentrates on IT-related initiatives rather than BPO specifically, these organisations contribute to the broader tech ecosystem that benefits the sector.

Industry associations, such as the ICT Association, also provide a strong bridge between policy-makers and BPO operators, ensuring that the sector’s needs are addressed. Tavlalashvili and Kanashvili stress that this alignment of public and private stakeholders has been critical to the sector’s momentum.

7. Industry Success Stories

Georgia is already home to a mix of international and local players. Companies such as Making Science Sweeft (software development) and Evolvexe Outsourcing (customer support and tech services) demonstrate the ability of Georgian firms to deliver value across Europe and North America. Majorel, Concentrix, EPAM Systems and Viber have also scaled their operations in Georgia, validating the country’s growing importance on the global outsourcing map.

8. Cultural Fit & Service Excellence

Georgians are often described as the “first Europeans”, with a cultural heritage rooted in hospitality, loyalty and respect for education. This translates into a natural customer-service orientation, where tone, empathy and relationship-building come naturally. This cultural foundation gives Georgian agents an edge in handling sensitive, customer-facing interactions with empathy and professionalism.

9. Innovation, Growth & Future Trends

Georgia is moving beyond traditional call centres into higher-value areas such as software development, fintech, AI-enabled services and digital operations. With IT exports surpassing $1 billion in 2024, the country is positioning itself as not only a cost-effective outsourcing hub but also a source of innovation and digital transformation expertise.

Looking ahead, Temo Magradze predicts that in the next three to five years, Georgia will transition from being primarily a low-cost option to a recognised hub for quality-driven, technology-enabled outsourcing, while still maintaining a commercial edge over EU and US markets.

Final Thoughts

Georgia is establishing itself as one of the most dynamic emerging BPO destinations in Europe. Its multilingual workforce, strong government backing, cost advantages and expanding digital ecosystem make it an attractive nearshore and offshore option for companies across the UK, EU and North America.

As Magradze, Tavlalashvili and Kanashvili each highlight, the country’s unique blend of hospitality-driven service culture and tech-driven innovation gives Georgia a competitive edge. While the sector is still developing compared with more mature hubs, Georgia’s momentum is undeniable, positioning it as a location to watch very closely in the years ahead.

Want to find out more or meet vetted providers in Georgia? Drop us a line, we’re happy to help you explore your options.

As self-serve improves, agents are increasingly left with the most complex queries.

Of course, it’s not always the case as many customers continue to prefer conversations over digital interactions, or are even digitally excluded, but for the most part, the expectation is that agents deal with call after call still, but with less and less respite where the query is nice and straightforward. And complex queries often involve multiple systems or multiple previous contacts, as they aim to follow the story. Which, if we go back to use case 1 – autowrap, we know our corporate memory can be patchy.

Yet customer expectation is that all of the necessary information is at the agent’s fingertips. And why shouldn’t they think that? Customers are often time poor and a bit frustrated already, so a longer than necessary call that may or may not answer their enquiry simply compounds their frustration.

What is the AI doing in Agent Assist?

As with all use cases to date, the AI is listening to calls to summarise key points. In Agent Assist – or ‘conversational guidance’, it is also retrieving and analysing previous data, so that, as with use cases such as auto coaching, it can make suggestions and guide processes during the customer interaction. It is, in effect, accessing and presenting the corporate memory that customers expect, but with bells on as it is also providing direction to the agent.

Key Benefits of Agent Assist: Assess customer needs

From the outset, the AI can help an agent understand what type of call they’re dealing with. Is this a customer with a quick query who is in a hurry, so it needs to be efficient, or do they have more complex needs that need to be addressed? Or even, is there an opportunity to cross- or up-sell to this customer?

Not only does this help to direct the nature of the call, it has an obvious impact on how the brand is perceived and even on topline revenue if it is possible to make a sale. Equally, it can prevent a clumsy attempt at a sale at the wrong moment, which could denude rather than enhance customer lifetime value.

This is also a key consideration in the push to self-serve, as customer experience becomes less personal and less represented by the people of the organisation. While a poor customer experience on a call can erode brand value, a great one can build far more than pure self-serve experiences.

Lower cognitive overload

In the context of agents needing to take more calls that are more complex, fatigue and cognitive overload is real. So while the last 15 years have been about focusing more on natural conversations and active listening, in a high-pressure, high-volume environment, doing that on every call is intense.

Of course, some agents may enjoy the need to think on their feet more than others, and therefore may be the ones who are trickier when it comes to adoption, but there are times when we all need a break from the mental strain of 100% concentration.

Optimise handling time

Agent assist can help to optimise handling time by keeping the agent on track, and reducing the amount of time spent unnecessarily building rapport. Of course some rapport is good, but if overdone, it can be confusing for the customer and result in repeat calls to resolve their actual query, rather than have a nice chat.

Accelerating the development of new starters

Dynamic conversational guidance allows new starters or less experienced agents to fly solo faster. They need to refer less to their supervisors for guidance (which in itself interrupts the flow of the call) and build confidence more quickly.

All of which translates to an increase in customer satisfaction from the use of corporate memory to deliver a better experience and faster call handling with responses that are right first time.

Implementation Considerations: Agent behaviour change

Aside from non-negotiables, such as good data (an absolute pre-requisite here) and systems integration, a key consideration for Agent Assist is to understand that it requires a much greater change in agent behaviour than the uses cases to date. Because you are in effect re-engineering conversations. So while it can accelerate the performance of a new starter, a longer tenured agent may be more ‘stuck in their ways’.

That means it typically takes 8 to 16 weeks to realise all the benefits of agent assist, possibly more if everyone is remote rather than office based. However, a two-to-four-month window to embed such change is both a really short time in the grand scheme of things and a small price to pay for the benefits available. Even considering that there will be a degree of things being a little slower in the first instance as you go through the J-curve of implementation.

However, almost all those aiming to realise AI benefits are jumping straight to this use case. Whereas they could prove the case for AI on much quicker and easier wins that are less likely to fail. What’s more, if those use cases have been implemented first, they lay the foundations for agent assist, and make both implementation and adoption easier and faster too. Without having proved the case for AI to the humans in the equation, adoption is slower, if accepted at all, and the benefits won’t come.

Knowledge base quality

Secondly, jumping too quickly to pure LLM Agent Assist and simply connecting to a knowledge base of historic conversations, then presenting information based on that alone as guidance, is a dangerous place to be. Because that assumes that all previous conversations were exactly as you wanted them, and not littered with the conversations of poorly trained or poor performing agents. Mojo’s advice here is to use the LLM to read in your script and build out the flow for that script and the associated dynamic pop ups. And it is essential that the knowledge base is part of continuous improvement too.

Measuring Success

There are some obvious key metrics that will be impacted by Agent Assist, from AHT and FCR to CSAT. More broadly, agent progression and job satisfaction can be measured through agent feedback, and customer lifetime value through customer analytics.

In summary, the key benefits are:

• Increased agent satisfaction through reduced stress and increased performance
• Increased customer satisfaction through faster and more accurate call handling
• Reduced average handling time through more pointed conversations
• Increased FCR through more accurate assessment and solutions
• Improve opportunity spotting for x-sell and up-sell and guide to a sale
• Improved customer lifetime value (CLV/LTV)

Done well, Agent Assist tools can enhance the capabilities of contact centre agents through intelligent support that enables agents to navigate complex queries or attempt to make sales with confidence. Which leads to more effective and satisfying customer interactions, greater customer lifetime value and even the potential to shift mindset from the contact centre as a cost centre to a value-driving profit centre.

To find out more about how CCP can help you make the right technology choices, read more here or get in touch.

This series of articles is drawn from our webinar with Jimmy Hosang, CEO and co-founder at Mojo CX. We explored seven key use cases for AI in contact centres, starting from the easiest productivity gains to value generating applications. You can find a summary of all seven use cases here, or watch the webinar in full here.

In an article published in the run up to Christmas 2024, I discussed the growing tendency in many organisations of the traditional Christmas peak starting to diminish, due to a variety of factors. Musing on the question of whether we had “…passed peak peak” (see what I did, there?) I wondered whether a reduction in the scale of ‘peak seasons’ was being paralleled by a growth in other sorts of both structural and spontaneous increases in contacts.

I was reminded of this article – and the discussions with colleagues and partners that inspired it – when I came across what was a new term to me, last week. The phrase is ‘perma-peak’ – the concept of a long-running or perpetual series of periods of high contact demand.

If the old, usually Christmas-related, peak season was the product of a society-wide, predictable (but hard to handle!) patterns of behaviour, then a perma-peak reflects a very different world. One in which both consumers and brands exhibit or can leverage greater personalisation, but in which demand patterns can spread and grow very rapidly:

1. Brands now have the ability to test and flex proposition and pricing, with instantaneous digital communication to customers and prospects
2. Social network effects can massively amplify the features and virtues of an offer or product – be that from an ill-prepared start-up or a settled, established big player. And, of course, negative aspects or faults can also be shared and multiplied, resulting in a flood of questions, complaints or claims

Pattern non-recognition

Despite advances in analytics automation and machine learning / AI, understanding and responding to demand changes in real time remains difficult and rare. Contact centres have always been operationally flexible and able to display great agility, but this is typically still a manual, even instinctive, response.

When insights are predominantly based on pattern recognition, increasing unpredictability makes operational flexibility a consistent challenge.

Likewise, agent assist and self-service tools and guidance will largely be optimised on the basis of prior experience. Unexpected demand spikes might be driven by either new query types and failure demand triggers, or factors in a novel combination.

Planning for the unplannable

In traditionally ‘peaky’ business sectors like retail, peak planning is an intrinsic part of how businesses are run. If you have a Christmas peak then thinking about how to handle it the following year typically starts in January, before the backlog of post-Christmas complex queries and complaints has even gone! Planning for the unpredictable is a different challenge.

So, if we really are entering an era of perma-peaks, will contract centre operations find themselves back in the era of watching service level charts drop precipitously whilst wondering what on earth is going on?

Not necessarily.

Perma-peaks need perma-flex

Just because tried and tested techniques are strained or start to fail, doesn’t mean that they can’t be revisited, adapted and fine-tuned.

• Workforce Management may become more orientated around rapidly identifying the different characteristics of peaks and corralling real-time shift flexing – and less about aligning scheduled staffing to forecast demand
• Your attempts to match staffing to demand may be less focused on seasonal efforts with shift banking and the use of temporary or fixed-term contract workers, but instead looking at incentivising intra-day shift flexibility or the peak use of a ‘gig’ model, using either in-house or outsourced workers
• Customer guidance, contact steering and self-service options will need to be able to be changed and weighted immediately in the light of peaks or troughs in demand. Root causes of demand spikes need to be identified and addressed – including restricting the promotion of or access to certain contact channels for limited periods, if required
• ‘Unforced errors’ by which organisations inadvertently trigger customer contact need to be avoided. Experience shows that the best way of doing this is through ensuring the contact centre has ‘a seat at the table’ when initiatives and campaigns are being designed

Whether you think that your next peak could be with you at any moment – or you’re confident that it will kick in from the 2nd week of October, just like every year – how to do you anticipate, plan and prepare?

Let us know; we’d love to share experiences and ideas.

What’s next? More of the same, that’s what! As we all know, that’s the nature of the regime; it’s here for keeps.

We know from the FCA’s reviews of firms’ mandatory Consumer Duty Board Reports that their initial assessment of the industry’s response to the requirements of Consumer Duty has been broadly “ok for starters, but you can try harder”!

The FCA’s update on its review of the Consumer Duty rules promised some simplification and removal of some arguably unnecessary, prescriptive requirements (in line with the Treasury’s ‘cut red tape’ agenda), but the range and depth of the permanent change in the treatment of customers that the FCA wants to see will remain.

This is to be expected and no doubt most firms are focused on the FCA’s specific callouts for Board Report improvements such as:

1. Improving the quality of data – and the insights derived from it
2. More fully reflecting the needs of different consumer cohorts, especially those with vulnerabilities
3. Ensuring that boards are challenging – and seen to be challenging – the business to meet the Consumer Duty’s requirements
4. Clarity on the timescale, action owners and data to drive planned improvements

But one further area for improvement will be particularly relevant to colleagues in the customer experience and/or contact centre space – “Comprehensive view across distribution chains”.

Yanking the chains

The FCA has long recognised the importance – and potential for the risk of service and experience failure – in distribution and supply chains. Many financial services organisations will have already had to review their supply chains to meet the FCA’s expectations around Operational Resilience.

Meeting the outsourced, sub-contracted and third-party challenge

In the context of Consumer Duty, though, the focus needs to be less on the dangers of total failure than the more subtle risks of poor visibility and exchange of information, and inconsistent consumer treatment and experience.

The way in which financial products and services are sold, delivered and supported can often involve multiple partners in the supply chain – covering sales, payments, customer service, claims, redemptions and other functions.

At nearly every point of the customer journey the way in which consumers are supported and interacted with, both through human-to-human dialogue and automated channels, creates a Consumer Duty risk.

Outsourced and sub-contracted relationships need to be managed to ensure that the standards of consumer data and insight; advisor training and empowerment; online and automated information and decision making; consumer recognition; fairness; and effective compliant recognition and resolution; are all delivered as well as they are in-house. To do so will require a blend of initiatives and efforts, including:

• Contracts and service–schedules; contractual management Information and KPIs
• Data and information security assurance, including payments (and the news that Marks & Spencer’s recent £300m cyber-attack is being blamed on a 3rd party supplier’s error highlights the criticality of this area)
• The quality assurance and provision of guidance and information to both customers and advisors
• The ability to share and identify customer profiles and features (especially vulnerability factors)
• Advisor training and coaching
• The provision of self-serve and assisted support tools and concessionary measures

(and all of these are an ongoing commitment, not just a ‘one time fix’)

In Summary

Managing complex customer supply chains can be tricky at the best of times, but adding in a raft of demanding regulatory expectations and requirements makes it more difficult still.

Have you already met this challenge or are you still assessing how to better go about it? Let us know. Get in touch, we’d love to chat.

Identifying and supporting vulnerable customers – such as those experiencing financial difficulties, health issues, or emotional distress – is crucial for ethical, compliant and effective service delivery.

While the FCA has long taken a leading role in this space, other regulators such as Ofcom and Ofgem have also required vulnerability protections to be in place, with the UK’s Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCC), which came into effect on 6 April 2025, also widening the concept of vulnerable customers.

With thresholds higher than ever, the risks of not identifying vulnerable customers can be significant. Fines can now be imposed without a court order and at eye-watering levels, with reputational risk a compounding facto, not to mention the impact on vulnerable individuals themselves.

What’s more, with the divergence between UK and EU law, any cross-border businesses need to be even more on their toes in different jurisdictions.

What is the AI doing to detect vulnerability?

With the preceding three use cases essentially laying the groundwork for this kind of analysis and management, AI can identify signs of vulnerability by analysing speech patterns, language cues, and emotional indicators.

Key benefits: Categorisation and risk scoring

Vulnerability is a spectrum, and customers can move in and out of vulnerable states or between risk factors. Detecting this manually, however, is fraught with difficulty.

First, different people have different – and subjective – views on whether a customer may be indicating a vulnerability factor.

Second, the cues can be subtle and therefore challenging to pick up, especially when an agent – as a normal part of their job – is multi-tasking across multiple screens, taking notes and trying to hold a conversation at the same time.

But the AI is far less likely to miss those cues, because it isn’t distracted, isn’t having a bad or busy day, and doesn’t have empathy as an emotion. Any AI empathy is trained in data, and consequently consistently applied.

Record accuracy

As with use case 1, the use of AI enhances note taking and record-keeping by transcribing and summarising the call automatically. This avoids any temptation to rush the process, and risk non-compliance, while allowing the agent to focus solely on the customer’s needs.

Compliance alerts

While you could employ this kind of analysis in-flight, where prevention is almost always more desirable than cure, even a post-call analysis allows for flagging of potentially vulnerable customers and pro-active outbound or other management of that customer. retrospectively, and still gain some of the benefit, the nature of the regulatory and legal environment makes a real-time approach more desirable, with a prevention rather than cure approach.

Real-time vulnerability detection

The ultimate deployment of real-time detection during a call allows agents to adjust their approach on the fly. And for a true ‘belt and braces’ approach, if a risk score is exceeded, this can be flagged as a ‘red alert’ to the agent, very clearly instructing them not to sell, to do a welfare check, or provide relevant support information.

All of which not only manages the risk to individuals and the business, but empowers agents with the confidence to handle sensitive situations effectively and retains consumer trust through a commitment to their wellbeing that can also foster loyalty.

Implementation Considerations

Again, systems integration and data privacy are key factors in implementation, especially around matters of data usage and consent. As is training and embedding belief in the AI.

But where in other use cases it may be that the cost (or perceived cost) and complexity (or perceived complexity) of implementation of the AI project make the decision more difficult, in this instance, the potential of the AI is less about an ROI against cost than it is about ROI against the potential cost of those eye-watering fines if getting it wrong.

Measuring Success

Here, measurement may be a little trickier, depending upon how well you are able to understand the current baseline. Consider that manual QA is based on only 1-2% of calls, there could be whole swathes of risk going undetected.

The ideal situation is that there is nothing to measure. No issues, no incidents.

However, you can look at measures such as customer feedback from vulnerable customers, the numbers of interventions such as welfare or information provided, and adherence to regulations, particularly if using retrospectively rather than real time.

But the real benefits come from what doesn’t happen, rather than what does. In summary, they are:

• More frequent and consistent identification of customer vulnerability
• More accurate records
• More confidence in your compliance
• Less perceived risk within the business

Using AI to identify vulnerable customers enables contact centres not only to improve on consumer duty and meet the right ethical standards with empathetic and responsible service, it hugely decreases the risk of the worst possible outcome (from a business viability perspective) of an unexpected knock on the door from the regulator and/or widespread bad press.

To find out more about how CCP can help you make the right technology choices, read more here or get in touch.

This series of articles is drawn from our webinar with Jimmy Hosang, CEO and co-founder at Mojo CX. We explored seven key use cases for AI in contact centres, starting from the easiest productivity gains to value generating applications. You can find a summary of all seven use cases here, or watch the webinar in full here.

To explore why, I spoke with three top-class BPO and Jamaica experts, each of whom brings their unique perspective, from testing multiple outsourcing destinations around the world to Jamaican nationals deeply engaged in the country’s thriving BPO ecosystem.

According to Brad Meiller of Spectrum Brands, who has over a decade of client-side global outsourcing experience from in both retail and telecommunications, and whose philosophy is closely aligned with CCP’s own, while cost and service quality matter, it’s cultural alignment that often makes the biggest difference. And in his view, Jamaica ticks all the right boxes.

1. English-Speaking Advantage

As a native English-speaking country with strong cultural ties to the UK and US, communication is seamless, nuanced, and naturally aligned with Western service expectations. This fluency translates to higher first-call resolution rates and empathetic customer service experiences. And it’s not just language. Jamaican agents bring tone, warmth and cultural familiarity to the table too.

Jamaica is the third-largest English-speaking nation in the Western Hemisphere, and its accent is well-received by British customers.

2. Infrastructure & BPO Ecosystem

Jamaica’s government has invested heavily in digital infrastructure and the BPO sector, recognising it as a key pillar of economic growth. The island now boasts multiple outsourcing hubs in cities like Kingston, Montego Bay, and Portmore, all supported by reliable high-speed internet, business parks, and international flight access.

Connectivity is robust and reliable, with redundant data centres in locations such as Miami ensuring business continuity. The country also hosts two incubators, 220 seats in Montego Bay and 140 in Kingston. This provides scalable options for both startups and growing teams.

Modern network infrastructure, including low-latency fibre and support from the Universal Service Fund, gives Jamaica the capacity to meet UK standards. Ongoing developments like Starlink’s entry to the market continue to strengthen Jamaica’s digital resilience.

Big names like Concentrix, Teleperformance, Sutherland and Alorica already operate successfully on the island, proof that Jamaica can handle high-scale, high-performance outsourcing operations. And with global success stories like Amazon, Netflix, and Target leveraging Jamaican talent, the island’s credentials are hard to ignore.

3. Strategic Time Zone Alignment

Many BPOs in Jamaica provide 24/7 coverage, with service hours tailored to key markets including the UK. For UK businesses, Jamaica’s location also supports efficient logistics. Direct flights from Kingston and Montego Bay to London, Manchester, and Birmingham make it one of the most accessible Caribbean destinations. And with such a solid telecoms infrastructure , remote work is also a viable staffing option, particularly useful for late-night or flexible coverage.

4. Talent Pool & Education

With a literacy rate above 88% and a large youth population, Jamaica is producing thousands of skilled graduates annually, many of whom are turning to the BPO industry for stable careers. Institutions like the University of the West Indies and local vocational programmes  are directly feeding the outsourcing workforce, with a strong focus on service, IT, and administrative support.

There is also strong industry-academia alignment. The Global Services Association of Jamaica works hand-in-hand with universities and training programmes to ensure the labour force is future-ready. And not just for entry-level roles, but for higher-value positions in areas like IT development, integrations, and knowledge-based work.

Jamaican education initiatives such as the HEART/NSTA Trust program provide training across a range of skills such as language communication, sales, data entry, CRM, and IT, ensuring a steady flow of qualified professionals.

5. Competitive Costs with Cultural Fit

While Jamaica may not always be the cheapest, it offers incredible value-for-money when you factor in native English fluency, low agent attrition, cultural compatibility, and a growing pool of trained talent.

At time of writing, the exchange rate between the British Pound (GBP) and Jamaican Dollar (JDM) remains competitive, as highlighted in recent research by Peter Ryan Strategic Advisory, a leading market research and consulting firm focused on CX and BPO.

Critically, the service offering goes beyond standard customer service. Jamaican providers cover front- and back-office functions, including sales, debt collection, IT support, and more.

Importantly, Jamaica is no longer viewed solely as a destination for transactional CX work. It’s now recognised for complex support roles, higher agent touchpoints, and knowledge process outsourcing (KPO) – including finance and accounting services aligned with UK qualification standards.

6. Government Support & Incentives

With special economic zones (SEZs), tax incentives, and strong partnerships with international investors, the Jamaican government has rolled out the red carpet for global businesses. Whether you’re setting up from scratch or partnering with an existing provider, the regulatory environment is built for speed and scalability.

The country’s legal system is modelled closely on the UK’s, providing familiarity and confidence for British and Commonwealth investors. The same is true of its education system, which mirrors the UK structure and standards.

Jamaica’s 2023 Data Protection Act aligns the country’s data policies with international standards, making it suitable for regulated industries like banking, healthcare, insurance, and utilities.

During the April 2025 Outsource2Jamaica event we attended, the government’s commitment was front and centre – Jamaican Prime Minister Andrew Holness personally welcomed international guests and industry speakers, underscoring the strategic importance of the sector.

As Gloria Henry of the Port Authority of Jamaica and Conrad Robinson of the Jamaica Promotions Corporation (JAMPRO)  – both are helping position Jamaica not just as a viable outsourcing option, but as a strategic hub for global service delivery – explained, Jamaica isn’t just promoting itself, it’s backing up its vision with significant public investment. Over $15 million has already been invested into talent development through global training programmes.

JAMPRO also offers “concierge-style” support to businesses entering the Jamaican market, further streamlining the setup and integration process for UK firms.

Final Thoughts

Jamaica is a smart, scalable, and soulful choice for businesses looking to outsource. With its blend of cultural alignment, language fluency, government backing, and operational maturity, Jamaica stands out as a trusted and future-ready BPO partner for UK businesses, particularly for those seeking alternatives to traditional offshore delivery points.

And as Brad Meiller shared with me, BPO selection processes across global organisations often involve extensive RFPs and a lot of box-ticking. Thanks to the strengths outlined above, Jamaican BPOs make that box-ticking exercise remarkably straightforward.

Want to find out more or meet vetted providers in Jamaica? Drop us a line, we’re happy to help you explore your options.

With thanks for their insights to Brad, Peter, Gloria, Conrad and CCP’s Phil Kitchen, who all attended the Outsource2Jamaica event in April 2025.

Quality assurance (QA) is a staple of every contact centre, more so where compliance and regulation demand it. Traditionally, manual QA reviews are concerned with the customer interaction itself, are labour-intensive and typically cover only 1-2% of calls.

While manual QA will pick up some training points, through a lack of comprehensive coverage, it often misses systemic issues that haven’t become immediately obvious elsewhere in the organisation but that could be found buried in call analysis.

What is the AI doing in Auto QA?

Auto QA uses artificial intelligence to automate the evaluation of both customer interactions through transcription (remember use case 1 – autowrap) and sentiment analysis, and what the agent did on systems.

Let’s examine the benefits.

Key benefits: Comprehensive coverage

With AI, it is possible to cover 100% of interactions; to fully assess agent performance consistently and at scale across all interactions and all areas of the QA scorecard, and send alerts straight to a team leader’s desktop.

Resource optimisation

With manual QA, you typically see around a 1:30 or 1:50 ratio of manual QA people to agents. But with Auto QA, you can expect around a 75% reduction in that overhead. Which is significant when working on fine margins, either in headcount reduction, or redirecting those resources to transformation or speech analysis tasks as opposed to data gathering.

Consistent evaluations

As with any human task, while we may believe all QA people are using their scorecard and delivering in the same way, even with calibration sessions and financial incentives, the chances of that being the case are slim; you may already know this from those calibration sessions. Indeed, the interpretation of the calibration itself may be flawed – for example, two different people may have very different takes on what constitutes empathy.

So while an AI scorecard evaluation of a voice interaction may, for example, only be 80% accurate to begin with, it is consistently 80% accurate, as opposed to the potential for human analysis to vary significantly and most likely sit at a lower accuracy figure of around 65%. Meaning more calls are scored at greater accuracy overall.

Real-time feedback

Finally, the benefits of real-time feedback while softer, are easy to understand. And completely measurable via the scorecard.

First, immediately picking up training points allows the agent to implement improvements on the very next interaction.

And second, for an agent taking hundreds of calls a day, picking up a training point even a few hours after the call occurred – especially if the interaction reason or resolution is atypical – makes it harder for the improvement points to stick, even with the benefit of the call to hand.

Implementation considerations

Aside from systems integrations, data privacy and compliance – and instead focusing more on the vagaries, of AI – accuracy (or lack of it) immediately translates through to an impact on human resources, where a less accurate AI could result in wasting resources on issues that aren’t issues.

Which is why it is always desirable to ensure there are humans in the loop (HITL), both in training, developing and refining the AI models, or in the process of checking its conclusions before delivering feedback.

With a combination of human review and machine learning improvements, the 80% accuracy figure can be improved to 85-90% accuracy in around four weeks, at which point you can consider pointing the human resources to different tasks. For systems interactions, including chat, you would expect greater accuracy from the AI from the outset, as it immediately has controlled data to assess.

If you can achieve 95-100% accuracy, per Mojo CX’s claims, then you can be confident human resources are targeted to where they are needed most. It may even be that you are willing to accept a lower rate of accuracy if the QA benefits outweigh the wastage. This is a decision unique to your business. And so as with use case 1, it’s important to understand the true baseline that the AI is improving upon.

Elsewhere, you may choose not to assess 100% of calls for processing and ESG reasons. These are all tolerances and optimisations that you can test and set to deliver against competing KPIs.

Measuring Auto QA success

For any AI implementation, it’s important to measure its success as this will build the case for future implementations. Whether that’s headcount, resource allocation QA KPIs or any of the many other contact centre KPIs.

In summary, the benefits are:

· 75% reduction in QA processing time

· 50-100 x increase in evaluated interactions

· 15-25% increase in evaluation accuracy and consistency

· Greater and faster improvement in agent performance and CSAT

While undoubtedly a little more complex to implement than use case 1, implementing Auto QA builds on those foundations by making use of call transcription and taking it to the next level.

To find out more about how CCP can help you make the right technology choices, read more here or get in touch.

This series of articles is drawn from our webinar with Jimmy Hosang, CEO and co-founder at Mojo CX. We explored seven key use cases for AI in contact centres, starting from the easiest productivity gains to value generating applications. You can find a summary of all seven use cases here, or watch the webinar in full here.

1. Call Pickup Rate – Low pickup rates may indicate poor dialling strategies or incorrect customer data. Are managers addressing these issues to improve connection rates?
2. Average Call Duration – Longer calls may suggest engagement or inefficiencies. Do managers have the available insight to help distinguish between productive interactions and wasted time?
3. Average Handling Time (AHT) – Balancing efficiency with quality is crucial. Are managers optimising processes to reduce delays without compromising service?
4. Answering Machine Detection Rate – High voicemail rates waste agent time. Are contact centres adjusting their approach to minimise this?
5. Rejection Rate – A high volume of unanswered calls may point to poor targeting or dialling strategies. Are managers refining their approach based on this data?
6. Agent Wait Time Between Calls – Excessive downtime signals inefficiency. Are workflows optimised to keep agents engaged and productive?
7. Conversion Rate – Success is measured by call outcomes. Are managers analysing why some calls convert while others fail, and adjusting strategies accordingly?
8. Occupancy Rate – Are agents being overworked, leading to burnout, or underutilised, resulting in wasted resources? Do managers have the right data and leadership skills to balance their team members’ workloads effectively?
9. Data Accuracy – Poor data leads to inefficiencies and failed connections. Are managers ensuring databases remain up to date?
10. Right Party Contact Rate – If agents aren’t reaching the intended recipients, performance suffers. Are managers taking steps to improve contact accuracy?
11. Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT) – A positive customer experience is essential. Are managers prioritising training to enhance service quality?

• Lack of real-time performance insights.
• Insufficient training for managers to interpret and act on KPI trends.
• Inefficient processes that fail to align with data-driven improvements.
• Gaps in technology preventing optimal call routing and workflow automation.

In today’s outsourcing landscape, success depends on much more than cost savings and process efficiency.

On 25^th February 2025, Neville Doughty and Phil Kitchen from the Customer Contact Panel hosted a webinar with Joe Hill-Wilson, CEO and Co-Founder of Learn Amp and Martin Hill-Wilson, Owner of Brainfood Consulting, to discuss Sustainable Operating Models in Outsourcing. One of the most important takeaways from the discussion on sustainable operating models is that Learning and Development (L&D) must be embedded into the core of every outsourcing strategy. Without continuous learning, sustainability simply isn’t possible.

Why Learning and Development is a Sustainability Driver

In outsourcing environments, teams often face rapid change, evolving client expectations, and shifting technologies. This is reflected in the data – 92% of organisations are facing high or very high risk of top talent leaving in the next year (Brandon Hall Group, HCM Outlook, 2024). Without a structured and ongoing approach to skills development, outsourced teams can struggle to keep pace, leading to inconsistent quality, reduced productivity, and higher turnover . During the webinar, 82% of attendees reported that current procurement practice restricts the value they can bring to their clients.

The key takeaway? Organisations that embed L&D into their operating models create more resilient, adaptable, and future-ready outsourcing workforces.

Challenges in Sustainable Learning for Outsourced Teams

The panel discussed the various challenges companies face when it comes to embedding learning into outsourced operations:

• Geographical and Cultural Gaps: How can we create a unified learning experience for teams spread across different countries, cultures, and time zones?
• Engagement and Adoption: With high attrition rates common in outsourced environments, how do we motivate teams to actively engage in learning?
• Measuring Impact: How can we quantify the ROI of learning programs in outsourcing partnerships?

What Effective L&D Looks Like in Sustainable Outsourcing

When looking at solutions for the challenges discussed, the panel noted the importance of centralised learning platforms that deliver consistent, engaging content to all locations. Platforms like Learn Amp help organisations create:

• Standardised onboarding programs to accelerate time-to-competence.
• Bite-sized, mobile-friendly learning content to fit learning into busy shifts.
• Social learning spaces that encourage peer-to-peer knowledge sharing.
• Data dashboards to measure engagement, skills development, and business impact.

Embedding L&D into Operating Models: 3 Key Strategies

Treat L&D as a Business Process, not a Project
Learning shouldn’t be an afterthought or an annual event. It needs to be a continuous, embedded process that evolves with the business and its outsourcing needs. 

Make Learning a Shared Responsibility
Learning success shouldn’t fall solely on HR or L&D teams. Operations managers, team leaders, and employees themselves all need to co-own learning outcomes. 

Measure What Matters
Sustainable learning models measure not just completion rates, but real business impact: faster onboarding; fewer errors; higher customer satisfaction; and improved employee retention. The LinkedIn Workplace Report shared that 94% of employees would stay longer if companies invested in their development. 

Key Takeaway

If there’s one key takeaway from the webinar, it’s this: sustainable outsourcing depends on sustainable learning. When organisations invest in embedding learning into every stage of the outsourcing lifecycle, they create an employee experience where team members thrive.

If you would like to access a copy of the recording it is available here: Webinar Link

The year ahead promises to be a turning point for customer contact. AI and automation are advancing at an unprecedented pace, yet businesses are facing economic uncertainty, rising costs, and rapidly shifting customer expectations. The pressure to adopt new technology and improve service levels means leaders must make bold, strategic choices.

At the end of 2024, we held our annual ‘Big Conversation’ to uncover key challenges for the year ahead and hear directly from cross-sector contact centre leaders about how they’re addressing them. These insights have shaped our latest whitepaper, 2025: A Year of Difficult Conversations?. In this paper, we explore those challenges in detail and outline priorities and solutions. One theme dominates: success in 2025 will depend on how well businesses navigate ‘difficult conversations’—both within their organisations and with their customer and suppliers.

How can you make the right tech decisions in the age of AI?

AI can be a powerful tool for improving operational efficiency. However, the reality is stark: according to Gartner, 80% of AI projects fail, which is twice the failure rate of non-AI projects. Despite this, the pressure in the boardroom to “do something with AI” is stronger than ever. The key question isn’t whether to implement AI, but how to do so strategically and safely.

When AI is implemented well it can deliver valuable results. But the risks of adopting this still fledgling technology can be significant—wasted investment, damage to reputation, and disruption to operations. The businesses that succeed with AI will be those that clearly define its use cases, align them with business goals, invest in high-quality, integrated data, and ensure that AI complements human expertise rather than replacing it. AI has the potential to be a game-changer—but only with careful consideration.

How do we meet economic, regulatory and resource challenges?

While grappling technology decisions, contact centres also face ongoing economic headwinds, regulatory challenges and a 15% decrease in headcount since 2019.

As businesses introduce new contact channels and explore innovative solutions, the fundamental customer need remains unchanged—a fast and effective response

But despite the rise in self-serve and co-pilot automation, customer satisfaction in the UK has declined. While automation is handling simple queries, agents are left to tackle only the most complex cases with fewer resources overall. Agents have little respite from more intense interactions and operations have fewer agents available. Even with future AI implementations, research predicts relatively modest headcount reductions of a maximum of 15%.

What’s more, in 2025, UK contact centres will need to absorb and manage an 8-10% increase in agent costs. Meanwhile the ongoing cost of living crisis means customers remain stressed and regulatory requirements add to operational demands —all against the backdrop of a muted growth forecast and ongoing economic challenges. No wonder things feel pressured.

Consequently, leaders are exploring various ways to optimise their service models, including offshoring, automation, or refining their approach.

Getting It Right: From Good to Great

One thing is clear. Transformation isn’t optional—it’s essential. The businesses that thrive in 2025 will be the ones that take a proactive approach. The most successful organisations will define clear, achievable AI use cases, align data, technology, and human expertise, prioritise governance, security, and compliance, and engage employees in AI adoption from the start.

The path ahead will present both opportunities and challenges, but with the right strategy, tackling today’s difficult conversations can pave the way for a stronger competitive edge tomorrow.

Read our paper for more detailed analysis of the challenges, but more importantly, how to tackle those challenges and put in place a positive programme of change.

The Whitepaper is free to download and immediately accessible below. We would love to hear your experiences too. Follow us on LinkedIn to share your thoughts.